The emerging issue of pharmaceutical products in water environment is getting a growing attention from scientists, agencies in charge of health security and populations. Knowledge is growing fast, but remains still partial and sparse. Consequently, health security institutions (i.e., the French Regional Health Agencies, which represented the Health Ministry in administrative parts of France) may have some difficulties to answer questions on specific local situations.
In this context, a study has been initiated to assess the
specific flux of pharmaceuticals in the different territories of Auvergne
(France). The first step of this study was to identify the main pharmaceuticals
and their origins of emission (by general population, health care facilities,
agricultural practices, industries …), their relative importance and the major
regional flows arising from these different sources. The second step of this
study was to better understand the health issues associated with the detected
pharmaceutical residues, and to identify the priorities of actions to be taken
(in terms of interest of analytical campaigns, sanitary survey… ).
The assessment of pharmaceuticals in the different
watersheds of Auvergne were obtained by modeling the data of pharmaceutical
consumption by the population of Auvergne (i.e., assessed by the reimbursement
data provided by the French Health Insurance) and the analysis of the
quantitative data of pharmaceuticals used in the different hospitals of
Auvergne.
In accordance with the French National Plan on Drug
Residues, this approach helped to determine the predictable environmental
concentrations (PEC) of forty seven molecules in the different watersheds of
Auvergne. These PEC can be used to assess exposure indicators and in a second
time, the health risk assessment. The worse-case method used for this study
(i.e., persistence in the environment, without metabolism), has overestimated
the concentrations of pharmaceuticals in watersheds. Furthermore, for each
pharmaceutical, calculated concentrations (PEC) were at the nano- or
microgramme per liter and the health effects seems poorly probable at these
levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment